WHAT BUGS ME:
A CULTURE HOOKED ON OIL - Do we even have a choice anymore of
whether to drive or not? Face it, our society is car-happy, and
I'm talking rev the engine, let it burn, straight addicted to
gas-guzzling beasts! A slight glance into the media will prove
my point that the major car manufacturers are spending multitudes
more on marketing SUV's than they are on whatever hybrids or
economical mileage models that are available today. Perhaps if
a high-class dealer, like Mercedes or BMW were
to really push an ad campaign about their brand new, more "earth-friendly"
vehicles, it might start a trend among people who can afford
to be conscious of such things. However for the majority of Americans,
our main focus is getting to and from either work, or the stores
we must frequent during our typical routines. The way in which
most suburban areas have spread, without planning by civil engineers
prior to their developments, has left our cities widely in convenient
in nature, where use of freeway is necessary to existence as
we know it. Now it is relatively well - known that the real culprit
for outrageous levels of Carbon Dioxide being released into the
atmosphere is not smokestacks or big businesses as much as it
is the exhaust pipes from millions of cars crammed onto the pavement
daily. his is slightly more complicated to regulate considering
the sheer amount of contributors to the problem . Nevertheless
the negative effects of smog and global warming are dispersed
across the earth, without any sense of causation or blame.They
call these "social costs", meaning the entire public
picks up the pollution tab, usually paying by way of suffering
health risks. So what can be done to alleviate the stress on
the environment, in regards to meeting the Kyoto Protocol or
the conflict in the Middle East? My best guess would be to subsidize
more alternative energy research and development, something on
the public agenda that took a serious dive during the Reagan
administration, and has never fully recovered its significance.
Finding ways to harness hydrogen would likely be more profitable
than drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
But then again, advancements bin technology do tend to be surrounded
by potential controversy. We return to the idea of people on
the extremes too often dominating the conversations with their
blatant, unbudging opinions and presuppositions. Nothing in turn
gets done, as with Congressional gridlock we've faced on and
off over the years. When environmental concerns were first brought
to the forefront of the country's political agenda, back in the
1970's, legislators were more than willing to cooperate without
burden of bi-partisan split, especially in regards to issues
that directly affected the health and safety of human communities.
I mean how obvious must the evidence be to induce change. Does
a piece of smog have to hit you in the head before you realize
the damage being inflicted by our common actions? We, the constituents,
all share the responsibility and the consequences of of the American
Dream, and could definitely be putting more concentrated
efforts towards stopping dependence upon foreign oil. Can you
imagine if this supermarket strike had been about gasoline? That's
what it will take to make a significant change and halt in the
increasing pollution trend that began in the days of Model T
Fordst Ciao
Magazine
|
|